Take a look at the profits of global HIV drug leader Gilead Sciences, from selling so called ARVs, Antiretroviral drugs:

Ever since Gilead Sciences first entered the market for HIV-related medications, they’ve steadily conquered an ever larger portion of so called “antiretroviral” drug therapy, world-wide. – Investors who invested early in Gilead have scored returns of 10,113% — in other words more than a hundred times their money!

“Over 70% of those being treated for HIV in Africa and the rest of the developing world are now taking Gilead’s antiretroviral drugs.”

– And those in the developed world? – Are they being given different drugs?

But what happened to the hapless people who believed in the official scarytale? – First, they would be administered at least two different tests, both of which are total frauds. Both, even in the descriptions on their inserts, officially deny that they are able to assert whether the HIV virus is present in the blood of the patient taking the test. The solution to this little problem – that doctors never mentioned to their patients – was to administer a second test, to “confirm” the first one. So, two tests had to be taken and paid for, both equally unable to confirm the presence of the virus on its own. The logic of this procedure was like saying that 0 + 0 = 1. As every 1^st-grader learns, 0+ 0 is still 0, but Big Pharma´s and Gov´s logic is not that of normal mathematics. We will see more proof of this, as we analyze AIDS statistics in a future report.

As if that wasn´t enough, it turned out that these tests were totally different from all other tests. The interpretation of the first test being used, called the Elisa test, was quite arbitrary. It was a matter of interpreting a sequence of many shades of colors. In practice this led to the rather unconvincing result that the same blood sample could yield a “positive” verdict in one laboratory, a “negative” in another, and an “undetermined” in a third. There is also a strong suspicion that this situation led to people known to be gay were far more likely to be interpreted as “positive” than those who were heterosexual.

Obviously, under these circumstances, patients would not be encouraged to repeat the tests, since the risk was that the result would be different from the first tests. Since AIDS was declared incurable and terminal, and the tests infallible, it would be difficult to explain a “negative” result in a patient who previously tested “positive”. If this happened and was acknowledged, it would be declared a sensational, inexplicable case.

The unlucky ones who tested “positive” would then solemnly be served their death sentence by the doctor, which in some cases was enough to kill them.  Many committed suicide, others died from a kind of Woodoo effect, where they firmly believed that they would die with no hope of a cure, and just gave up, shut down their immune system, and wasted away.

But most would not accept their death sentence that easily, and the whole plot would be revealed if it turned out that very few people died after being diagnosed “positive”. So something had to be done to ensure the declared outcome, namely that HIV infection must, sooner or later, cause AIDS which was incurable and terminal.

At the same time, people were demanding a treatment or cure. So, an old cancer chemotherapy drug was unshelved, that had been invented some 20 years previously but never approved for use on human beings due to its extreme toxicity. Yes, it was not because it had been found ineffective against cancer, as you are being told by Wikipedia or Google.  It had been patented by a US Government agency, but was now sold to the drug manufacturer Burroughs-Wellcome in England, who made billions on it in short order, because for many years it was the only authorized drug against HIV, and they charged $ 17,000 pr year pr patient for it in today´s dollars!

 And the result of this criminally expensive drug? – That during roughly the first 6 years, every single patient who took the drug as prescribed, died within 3 years, after horrible suffering. See there the proof that HIV causes AIDS, which infallibly causes death.

Note, that AZT was marketed as the drug that would “delay the onset of full-blown AIDS and improve the quality of life. Even if there was no cure, and all diagnosed with HIV would finally die. While the truth was that it was the drug that directly caused the death, but also caused the most horrendous possible symptoms, and cut their lives short by several years, compared to the original forecast that people should expect to live about 5 years without drugs after diagnosis.

I saw a friend of mine from my student days succumb to this medical terrorism. There was nothing wrong with him. He was perfectly healthy and full of energy and zest. He was an accomplished artist and teacher at a municipal art school in Spain, where he was forced to undergo a periodic health check.

The year was 1988, just a year after the AZT had been approved as the only AIDS “medicine”. The fraudulent test reacted to any antibodies present in the body from having previously fought any infectious disease.  Since the evasive “HIV virus” had never been isolated – and has not to this day, in spite of all claims to the contrary! – no specific antibodies could be identified to match a new hypothetical HIV virus.

The reason my friend reacted ”positive” to the test was probably that he had recently recovered normally from a bout with hepatitis, a common infection in Spain, therefore having the antibodies to that disease in his blood, and perhaps also because he was (probably) known to be gay.

He did not have any AIDS symptoms until some time after he began to take the drug, based on the test.  Then it took him only about two years on AZT, to progress from a healthy, high spirited, youthful man, full of energy, to dying in a hospital, after horrendous suffering, a bleak shadow of himself. The only reason he got sick in the first place, and then died, was the AZT drug. He was simply murdered by the establishment, along with everybody else who was “medicated” with AZT during those years.

Unfortunately, at that early time of the AIDS scarytale, I did not know enough to save my friend, and we lived very far from each other. He came and stayed with me for a week, after his diagnosis, and I did what I could for him, but not knowing anything about either AIDS or AZT, there was not much I could do.  And his untimely death only a little over a year after that, took me by surprise. Had I only been able to stop him from taking the drug, he would have remained healthy, and probably still be alive.

It was his death that made me begin my investigations into the AIDS drama, and what I found was blood-curdling to say the least.

What unfolded was a new kind of Holocaust, more subtle than the original one, and with a different target, and a different method of execution. Orchestrated by the US government in close collusion with the pharmaceutical industry.  I forget if it was Clinton or Bush who declared AIDS to be a matter of US national security!

Next, I quote a page from the official US Government site on HIV & AIDS, last updated July 21, 2019, with my own comments in brackets, inserted into the text in bold italics. Underlinings are also mine to emphasize certain statements. PLEASE PAY ATTENTION TO WHAT IS THE TEXT OF HIV.GOV, AND WHAT IS MY OWN TEXT! Otherwise it could become confusing.